Skip to main content

What is with the Possessive "My" When Referring to a City or Public Place?

I have seen MY most used on social media in two forms.


One, somebody moves out of state and constantly posts about how "great MY new town is" and "all the exciting things there are to do in MY town." I often wonder if perhaps they are trying to convince themselves of this more than family and friends left behind. Like their old city was never theirs, but here, they finally belong – or so they want everyone to believe.

The second instance, which I'm focusing on today, is a hometown local who lives in the same city he or she grew up in, constantly referring to the neighborhood as "MY town."  A recent caption I saw really struck my curiosity.

"Enjoying MY afternoon in MY town."

It's as though the person is saying the town is as much hers as her own afternoon belongs to her. I understand it is territorial, most likely some competition. "I was here first. I have always loved this town," as though a new resident can't possibly love the city just as much. But, why not say "Enjoying my afternoon in OUR town"? Surely, there are lifelong residents who love the area just the same if not more, who may also be older in age and can throw that card around for having loved local longer.

Terming it "my" is possessive and segregating, but saying "our" is including others; it is sharing in the love of a community, knowing all the people in the neighborhood make the town the great location it is. The irony is by not referencing this matter of fact, the poster is technically denying that her neighbors are exceptional members of the local community, which is subtracting their influence on making the town the friendly neighborhood it is.

Thus, she is not acknowledging the true reasons why she actually loves "her town." It's almost like taking all the credit for a great community oneself. If it was not for others, the poster might not feel the same and have no desire to claim her hometown her own possession.

In my opinion, repeatedly referring to a public entity as large as a city, town, or village constantly as MINE when that pronoun is out of context in such a statement, it is not showing the local love and dedication the person may think it is, but instead indicating they are possessive, unwelcoming, and in a competition to prove they are the best.  It is an indication of insecurity and feeling shallow.

By speaking highly of your town, sharing pictures and news, and even indicating how long you have lived there, your love of local will surely shine to other residents on its own. Thus, MINE is not necessary to use unless the poster is trying to prove she loves her town more than other residents or possibly is even in a real or imagined competition for local socialite status.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Derailing Vs. Getting on Board with Theories of Tiffany Valiante's Death

This post is about "Mystery at Mile Marker 45," the first episode in season 3 of Netflix's Unsolved Mysteries, which tells the story of Tiffany Valiante, a recent high school graduate with a promising future, who was suspiciously struck by a train after disappearing from outside her New Jersey home in July 2015. It is assumed one has already viewed the episode before reading my thoughts and opinions on this case. SPOILERS will be given!   Fact or Fiction?  I have seen several people discussing supposed facts that were left out of the episode, alleging Tiffany had stolen from her parent's bank account in the past, that CPS visited regarding abuse by her mother in the months prior to her death, and supposedly an axe recovered as evidence near the scene was lost by investigators before testing. Although I did find her autopsy report with the little bit of searching I did, I only saw this rumored information on gossip websites or other people talking on threads how they ...

Whoever is trying to bring you down is below you; you are above whomever is trying to bring you down

Not sure which version of this quote I like better, but I do believe it's a valid statement.  If someone is trying to bring you down; whether it's by spreading false rumors about you behind your back, publicly attacking something of yours, or even just giving you constant criticism to your face; I think most people would agree then they are clearly below you in their moral standards and personal ethics, not to mention their levels of integrity and kindness! And, if someone is more focused on bringing you down instead of on their own work or personal goals, it probably does indicate you are above them — or at least, that they believe you are somehow ahead of them and thus, view you as competition to eliminate.  Whichever way you look at it, it's unfortunate there are people like that. Too many people turn things that shouldn't be into a competition when it would serve us all better to help and support one another instead — or at least to just conc...

"It's Good to Know Who Hates You, and It's Good to be Hated by the Right people"

  I had to think about the second part of this one a bit, but I do concur. \   Haters tend to hate people they feel intimated or threatened by, in competition with, or envious of. Usually, there is no real reason for their hatred, other than those people are different than them; whether in looks, personality, interests, or any other qualities. In acknowledging that, if people are hating on someone who tries to be kind and respectful to all, somebody truly altruistic in their helping of others, it is fairly safe to conclude the haters lack some — or all — of those genuine qualities in themselves. Therefore, the good person is being hated by the "right" people in that they are hated simply because they are not hateful like the haters, nor would they ever want to be filled with hatred like them in exchange for their not being hated! This not only reveals the haters for whom they really are, but also confirms the good person the "hatee" is. Thus, in this case, it is ac...